Asia Forest Partnership

 Home > Events > AFP 3 > Presentation and Discussion

Search     
print-version 

4. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON CONCRETE ACTIONS

Presentations were made by the work plan sheets proposed by the leading partners and followed by interventions from the floor. It was agreed that the drafter of each work plan sheet would revise and distribute the work plan sheet through AFP contact at CIFOR. The revised work plan sheets are linked form this draft.

4.1 On going activities of CIFOR, Presented by Takeshi Toma

For showing the importance of information sharing, two of CIFOR’s activities were presented. Since those are on going activities, links are made to the wab pages of the activities for detailed information.

This is an ongoing research project This project was conceived because there have been a number of rehabilitation projects since last decades, but still not clear what is actually rehabilitated, or what needs to be rehabilitated.

He then listed quite a few initiatives of current ongoing rehabilitations programs or projects that relate to this research. There is a need to exchange information and make the insights from the research available to those programmes and projects.

The Forest Spatial Information Catalog (FSIC) is a tool for searching and browsing the contents of a metadata service—a central repository for forest related spatial metadata

Hugh Speechly (DFID)
FSIC may overlap with what is proposed by FLEG: Clearing house of information. Important to know in detail what the Forest Spatial Information Catalogue is about, to make sure that there is no duplication of efforts.

Should this only cover Indonesia or should it have a regional cover?

Takeshi Toma responded:
We hope that FLEG will utilize or build on the FSIC which is being developed. The FSIC covers world wide information.

Haruo Sawada (FFPRI)

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan is collecting satellite images of all Asian countries (low resolution images, Satellite Information Data Base [SIDaB]) and daily monitoring data from the Asia Pacific Network for Disaster Mitigation using Earth Observation Satellite. Those are freely down loadable. It could be considered as a source of information of the Catalogue. The evaluation of the information is essential for the Catalogue as AFP.

4.2 Compilation of database of training resources in the Asia regions on sustainable forest management, proposed by Yuji Imaizumi

There is a high need for training and capacity building. This information will make it know where facilities are available, such that they become more used, and duplication can be avoided.

Javed Mir.
Why not follow the successful example of google. One of the problems of integrating data is compatibility. Rather one could have model of linking training and capacity building info points.
Content. There are millions of manuals and training book. We would need to consolidate capacity and training material. Need to build some kind of relational database.

Edwin Brown.
We need to look at organizations like FAO to see what they have gathered in terms of consolidated information syntheses.

4.3 Presentations and Proposals for combating illegal logging and etc.

  • Activity of the TNC in East Kalimantan, presented by Byron Siegel

Responses from the participants

John Andrew Roby (Timber Trade Federation)

He represents UK private sector organization. AFP/ proposals recognize private sector, but the does not emanate real effort to engage the private sector. Urges AFP to go back to private sector organizations and ask them if they want to be engaged.

There is one international initiative by FAO to develop a repository of laws and regulations related to forestry from all UN countries. FAO is setting it up, and looking for funding.

The UK private sector is looking for documentary proof of legality, because markets in UK are asking for this. The UK Government, for instance, are required to purchase only legal timber. This is something that government representatives of AFP could pursue in their own countries.

Now we have the framework to work on this throughout Europe. Therefore Timber Trade Federation is looking for any organization that wants to work with them

Maharaj Muthoo

Work plans illegal logging could be fitted into a larger work plan on certification. Most of all certification, may be more than 90%, are northern developed. They are used in the South. If local certification systems are not supported, than certifications will not work.

There should be no double standards. Testing of legality should also be applied to processed products that are imported from countries that import illegal timber.
But prices of timber of forest products must go up, otherwise certification cannot work.
By imposing high standards we create new barriers, this will only promote illegality.

Math Green (EC)

Major wood consuming partners should reduce consumption of illegal sourced wood. Hope that EU action plan of FLEG should be linked to AFP.

Togu Menurung

Propose a work plan to combat illegal logging in the areas where the logging is taking place. In part this requires to facilitate collaboration between Indonesia and Malaysia government.

Indonesia is proposing a log export ban. There is a need that all the wood products that are manufactured in Indonesia are prepared from wood/ timber that is sourced legally.

There is a need for immediate action, giving the urgency of the problem of illegal logging.

Edwin Brown

What USA has been doing is President’s initiatives against illegal logging. Global initiative that has a high level of support. Copies of documentation of the initiative provided.

US will is very interested in work plan related to customs.

Patrick Durst (FAO)

FAO is very willing to collaborate with illegal logging activities. FAO has a long history of tracking forest laws in various countries, and will be very interested in collaborating on this issue.

FAO has also been engaged in a series of studies on incentives for plantation in eight countries. Some of that information will be quite relevant for the smallholder plantation work plan. FAO will be organizing two workshops soon on these studies.

Ahma Bin Buang (ITTO)

AFP should be more realistic in formulating of its work plan. Work plans have also to be realistic. Work plans also have to reflect needs of AFP itself. AFP must find its own niche in illegal logging. AFP must touch base with the real problem on the ground. We must come up with something unique that distinguishes it from all the other initiatives related to illegal logging.

He also mentioned the need for resources to assure AFP's sustainability, comparing funds committed so far with the Congo Basin Forest Partnership's US$50 million. He also referred to the current "obsession" with illegal logging and the need for cohesion between sustainability C & I, forest certification and legal compliance.

Yuki Sakamoto (Global Environmental Forum)

Needs to include actions in Russia. Of instance the “customs” proposal could include Russian customs.

Javed Mir

Proposed to prepare the affiliation matrix. Rows: put the different topics (proposals).
Column different organizations. Each organization can put per each proposal what it can contribute.

Arbi Valentinus (TELAPAK)

NGO monitoring illegal logging in Indonesia. Work plan on custom agencies is a good proposal. Also work plan to analyze market access is also good, especial activity number two. Work plan of developing minimal standards of legality. This focus is already being discussed under the MOU between UK and Indonesia related to illegal logging.

Proposes to set up working group that is active in between meetings.

Frederik Vossenaar (Netherland)

Confusion of comparison of certification schemes. Foundation Kerhout made a comparison of certification schemes. Dutch governments is not yet partner, but there is willingness to collaborate. Involvement of civil society and especially of the corporate sector is of high interest of the Dutch government. If those partnerships were created, possibilities for funding would be real.

Andrey Laletin (Friends of Siberian Forest)

Very interested in putting Russian customs into the custom work plan. Many examples of illegally sourced and traded timber to China, that eventually is exported to USA. Minimum standards of legality also very much appreciated and of high importance for Russia.

Yong Teng Koon (MTCC)

Was of the view that illegal logging should be addressed in the overall context of forest and timber certification. AFP should encourage and support existing national certification schemes. He mentioned about the Pan ASEAN Timber Certification Initiative which was established with a view to identify a core set of criteria and indicators that are applicable to ASEAN member countries and informed that The Ad-Hoc Working Group on Pan ASEAN Timber Certification Initiative will hold its third meeting in Jakarta in January 2004. Efforts and resources of AFP should be channeled to such on-going efforts. It is very important for consumer countries not to overburden tropical countries to comply with so many requirements. Consumer countries should make known their minimum requirements with respect to timber certification so as to facilitate tropical producer countries in developing standards that meet their requirements, including legal compliance.

Aditya Bayunanda

On minimum standard of legality and developing timber tracking system, formulation of a minimum standard of legality is not appropriate, as the separation is either legal or illegal is clear thus a minimum standard is not applicable, and that timber tracking systems are already available, in Indonesia the LEI system and in Malaysia the MTCC timber tracking system so there is no need for reduplication.

Hugh Speechly

Defining a minimum standard of legality should be done on an individual country basis as each country's laws are different and must take into account broad stakeholder views on what is important. Work carried out under the Indonesia-UK MoU should have useful lessons about how to do this, but this doesn't mean that a definition agreed in Indonesia can be transported to another country.

Harmonisation between different initiativesis really necessary as there is a need to avoid overlapping activities, especially between FLEG and AFP. With many parallel initiatives there is a real risk that resources in participating countries are overstretched.

Customs coordination is a very important aspect of controlling illegal trade. However, it will require knowledge of the legal basis for each country's customs agency. In the UK, for example there is currently no law, apart from CITES, that would allow customs to intercept an illegal shipment.

The UK's public procurement policy recognises that full certification is currently not possible in all cases but specifies legality as a minimum requirement.

Hiroshi Kudo closed the discussion

At second meeting of AFP partners agreed on what issues to promote. Proposals have been developed based on these agreements. Now we should discuss how to realize these proposal. If we have no more clarity of how to implement, than we did not have any progress. We need take one step further from previous meeting and need to make agreements on how to implement proposals.

Proposes further plan of action

  • Drafters of the work plans/ activities will incorporates all observations provided and drafts a new version of the work plan.
  • The new version will be sent to the lead partners first, and then to all the AFP partners (via the focal points). There will be various international meetings over the next months where consultation can take place (in limited form) about these work plans.
  • Time limits. This is influence by the meetings where informal consultations can be held, but also by funding disbursement requirements of some of the governments.
  • The 3rd Meeting of the Ad - hoc Working Group on a Pan ASEAN Timber Certification Initiative will be held in Jakarta at the ASEAN secretariat, 8-9 January. This can be an opportunity for the partners interested in the illegal logging work plans to meet.

 

 

[Agenda of Meeting] [1. Opening session] [2. Reports] [3. Organizational Matters of Asian Forest Partnership] [Presentation and Discussion on Concrete Actions] [Clossing items] [Feed back from the participants] [List of Participants]

Your comments and suggestions are most welcome. Please send them to afp@cgiar.org

Last Update: Monday, December 06, 2004
Copyright © AFP 2003 - Site Design: Center for International Forestry Research
Webmaster: webmaster-cifor@cgiar.org